Home·Research Tests
ADAPTIVE ROBOTICS · SCENARIO 4

Scenario 4: Adaptive Robotics — Navigation in a Changing Environment

100×100 Grid · 800 Steps · 5 Phases · Mobile Hazards · No Map · No Reward Function
Dumitru Novic · February 2026 · 100×100 grid · 800 steps · 5 phases

Abstract

A robot navigates a 100×100 continuous grid over 800 steps across 5 distinct phases of increasing complexity: mobile hazard barriers, relocating resources, and variable sensor noise. The robot has no global map, no reward function, and no policy updates — strategy emerges from genome-encoded survival pressure and local sensing only. Mean fitness (harsh_dynamic): 137.53. Best seed (702): 139.27. Adaptation score: 0.744 across all 5 phases.

137.53
Mean fitness (harsh_dynamic)
139.27
Best seed fitness (702)
0.744
Adaptation score (5 phases)
5
Distinct environmental phases
1,200
Max population reached
~550
Steps where survival stabilizes

1. Experimental Setup

Phase Structure

PhaseStepsPrimary ChallengeHazard Type
Phase 10–160Baseline navigationStatic hazard zones
Phase 2160–320Relocating resourcesMobile food zones + static hazards
Phase 3320–480Hazard barriersDynamic barriers (maximum pressure)
Phase 4480–640Sensor noiseGaussian noise on all sensory inputs
Phase 5640–800Combined challengeAll previous elements simultaneously
  • Local sensory range only — no global state observable
  • Genome-encoded: risk aversion, exploration radius, memory weight, jump probability
  • No explicit map construction or planning algorithm
  • Energy-based survival: collecting resources increases energy; hazards deplete it

2. Results

Best trajectory
Fig 1 — Phase-colored trajectory (seed 702). Each color represents one phase. The robot successfully navigates all 5 phases without a global map, showing emergent path optimization around dynamic hazard zones.
Fitness evolution
Fig 2 — Fitness evolution across evaluations. Selection pressure from inZORi consistently favors higher-fitness genome configurations.
Phase survival
Fig 3 — Average survival steps by phase with adaptation score distribution. Phase 3 (hazard barriers) is the most challenging; genome selection pressure is highest here.
Hazard-resource balance
Fig 4 — Hazard hits vs. resources collected per evaluation. Greener points indicate higher fitness. Successful strategies minimize hazard exposure while maximizing resource collection.

Phase-by-Phase Performance

PhaseChallengeApprox. Mean SurvivalNotes
Phase 1Baseline>95% of stepsEasy baseline
Phase 2Mobile resources~88%Requires active tracking
Phase 3Hazard barriers~72%Maximum selection pressure
Phase 4Sensor noise~80%Memory weight selected higher
Phase 5Combined~69%Hardest condition
OverallStabilizes ~step 550Adaptation score: 0.744

3. Key Findings

  • Mean fitness 137.53 in harsh_dynamic condition — robust multi-phase adaptation.
  • Phase 3 produces the strongest genome selection pressure; organisms with lower risk tolerance survive.
  • Stability at ~550 steps: genome distribution converges to a stable behavioral profile before the final phase.
  • Population reaches 1,200: positive selection maintained even under maximum environmental pressure.
  • Adaptation score 0.744: robot maintains 74.4% of Phase 1 performance across all 5 phases — strong for no-map navigation.

4. What This Demonstrates

Emergent Navigation Without Explicit Planning

inZORi produces adaptive navigation strategies in complex, multi-phase environments without any map, planning algorithm, or reward shaping. The 5-phase structure specifically tests transfer: does a strategy that works in Phase 1 survive Phase 3? The genome distribution shifts at each phase, selecting different behavioral profiles — genuine adaptation, not pre-programming.

Analogs: Warehouse robots, UAVs in variable wind, autonomous vehicles in changing traffic — any system needing adaptation without retraining.

5. Reproducibility

Framework: inZORi v1.0  |  Grid: 100×100  |  Steps: 800  |  Phases: 5

Fitness: Weighted combination of survival steps, resources collected, hazard hits avoided

Best seed: 702 (fitness 139.27)  |  Max population: 1,200

Note: Genome parameters and selection mechanics are proprietary. Environment layout, phase structure, and evaluation metrics are fully disclosed.

Home·Research Tests